New FDA proposals have less to do with increased safety than with upping the organization's profit margins

Upping the ante

New FDA proposals have less to do with increased safety than with upping the organization’s profit margins

Despite all its “hard work” the FDA keeps finding itself in the hot seat, approving drug after drug that later turns out to be dangerous — and downright lethal in many cases. To remedy that situation, the powers that be in the Administration whipped up a new draft legislation full of proposals that will supposedly “improve food and drug safety in the United States.”

The problem is, when you take a look at those proposals, it becomes painfully clear that they have way more to do with adding yet another layer to the FDA’s already thickly lined pockets than they do with protecting you and me from harmful substances.

For example, the draft legislation calls for all U.S. food manufacturers and all international food manufacturers exporting food to the U.S. to pay $2000 per facility per year to register with the FDA. The FDA estimates that this will bring in $600,000,000 per year, which will more than double its current kickbacks — I mean, “food safety budget.” These “registration fees” will also extend to drug companies and medical device manufacturers.

So where does the increased safety come in, you might wonder? Well, in return for all the cash these companies will be forking over, the FDA has promised to inspect food plants every four years, instead of once a decade, as it does now. Drug manufacturing facilities will be inspected every two years. And topping off these “security measures,” the draft legislation would also give the FDA “the power to order food and drug recalls.”

Perhaps I’ve been living under a rock I wasn’t aware of, but doesn’t the FDA already have that power? And couldn’t they easily step-up their inspection process without an extra $600+ million dollars per year?

I suppose no one likes to do extra work without extra pay, but when that “extra work” means saving the lives of millions of people, you’d think a little selflessness might come into play at some point. Then again, this is the government we’re talking about.

Health Disclaimer! The information provided on this site should not be construed as personal medical advice or instruction. No action should be taken based solely on the contents of this site. Readers should consult appropriate health professionals on any matter relating to their health and well-being. The information and opinions provided here are believed to be accurate and sound, based on the best judgment available to the authors, but readers who fail to consult appropriate health authorities assume the risk of any injuries. The publisher is not responsible for errors or omissions.