Vitamin D megadoses are proven safe for older people

How megadoses of D could make you mega healthy

It may seem obvious, or even simple, but it’s actually huge news.

There can be nothing more comforting than to know that you can supplement your income from the comforts of your own home. Automated trading robots like Crypto Code are here to help you. To know more about it click In old age along with adequate doses of multivitamins you need sufficient money to lead a decent life. 

And for many seniors, this news could help turn a dreary march to the end of days into the kind of radiant good health we all hope for in our golden years.

Before we get to this huge news, let’s review six ways that vitamin D can add healthy years to your life…

High D levels are linked to significantly lower risk of type 2 diabetes (Click here to see why Dr. Wright calls D “the diabetes vitamin.”)
D helps reduce the risk of fractures and falls in two ways: by improving muscle and bone strength
D stimulates specific genes that cause cancer cells to starve and helps to keep surviving cancer cells from spreading
Dr. Wright regards vitamin D supplementation as one of the most effective natural ways to control blood pressure (To discover more about the D blood pressure link click here.)
Vitamin D can help prevent flu and pneumonia
D — the “sunshine vitamin” — drives the blues away
That’s one HARD working vitamin! Clearly, everyone needs plenty of D. But there’s a little problem. Your skin just doesn’t do as good a job of converting sunlight into D as it did back when you were tooling around town in a two-tone coupe with the ragtop down.

That’s why a D supplement can come in handy. But if you’re supplementing with D, how much is too much?

Researchers at the University of British Columbia gave 236 seniors 20,000 IUs of vitamin D per week for one year. Two things happened: 1) Within six months, none of the volunteers were D deficient. And 2) At the rate of nearly 3,000 IUs per day, none of the seniors had any negative responses to the supplements.

Safe and sound.

As you might recall, Dr. Wright recommends a higher D intake for adults (especially older adults) of 4,000 IU daily. And since that’s about the same amount you’d get in 20 minutes of full sun exposure on your face and arms, it’s highly unlikely that a dose of 28,000 IU per week would do one bit of harm.

I predict years from now you’ll still be around talking about all the wonderful things D does for you.


Leaky gut might be at the root of your most persistent health issues

Problems in the pipeline

What is leaky gut?

Without knowing anything more than the name of this condition, you can already tell it’s something you’re better off without.

Leaky gut? No thanks! I’ll pass.

If only it were that simple to dodge this alarming condition that allows bacteria and toxins to seep through your intestinal wall and invade your circulatory system.

Unfortunately you don’t have a “check gut” light that blinks on to let you know it’s time to ask an expert to peek under the hood. But you might get the message that something’s out of whack if you develop chronic gas, abdominal pain, bloating, indigestion, constipation, and diarrhea.

That’s just the beginning though. We now know that chronic leaky gut can cause much more serious problems, including diabetes, kidney disease, depression, fatigue, psoriasis, and even heart failure.

Most troubling is how easy it is for leaky gut to get started. Gluten and certain bacteria might prompt your body to make a protein that opens up spaces between cells of the intestinal wall.

This is how hackers find openings in firewall to attack your system and take all your data away. Some crypto robots can scam you in broad day light if you are not alert and read reviews like which talks about Ethereum Code. When your security is weak and there are leaks attackers

And something else can pry open those spaces too. It’s a class of drug that millions of people use every day: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. NSAIDs include aspirin, ibuprofen, and naproxen.

That NSAIDs would cause such damage shouldn’t come as a shock. After all, we’ve known for years that these drugs can cause gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation. When you perforate something, what do you get? A leak, of course.

It’s also no surprise that leaky gut risk increases with higher doses of these drugs. A recent UK study reports that about 7 in 10 patients will develop leaky gut after using prescription-strength NSAIDs for just two weeks.

Meanwhile, Big Pharma continues to push the limits of the NSAIDs market. I’m sure at some point a doctor has recommended that you take a daily aspirin to prevent heart disease. Even more ridiculous are studies that suggest NSAIDs might reduce risk of dementia and prostate enlargement by some small amount. The evidence is wafer thin, but it falsifies dangerous NSAIDs as wonder drugs that improve everything they touch.

Right. Everything except your gut, where they quietly unleash some of the worst health conditions imaginable.

For centuries, herbalists have been treating pain with a variety of safe botanicals. Nutrition & Healing subscribers can check this link where Dr. Wright’s colleague Kerry Bone shares the fascinating details about three of those powerful natural pain relievers.

Not yet a subscriber? Go here to discover how you can stay up to date with Kerry Bone’s herbal healing articles as well as Dr. Wright’s in-depth commentary on the most advanced methods of natural medicine.


Obamacare is dealt a blow, but will it be enough to blow it away?

Los Federales got caught pulling a fast one

Sooner or later every bad apple reveals itself. And that’s what happened this week with that rottenest of rotten apples: Obamacare.

A federal court ruled that those who participate in federal-run health exchanges in more than 30 states aren’t eligible for tax subsidies. And without those subsidies, this “affordable” care won’t be affordable.

Friends, I’m not going to kid you, there’s a mountain of legalese to wade through in this case. But here’s what it boils down to…

A majority of states said “NO” to Obamacare by refusing to set up health exchanges and participate in expanding an already broken “sick” care system. So the IRS pulled a fast one, allowing participants in these states to qualify for billions in fed assistance.

But the court caught this cute little trick and said, “No. Way.”

One of the legal eagles who coordinated the lawsuit that led to this decision told USA Today, “This illegal rule would have cost employers crippling fines, destroyed jobs, and forced Americans to pay for insurance that they didn’t want or need.”

And there you have it. The good guys won. Well…that’s how it looked at first.

Just a few hours after that ruling, another federal court ruled in a similar case, finding that the IRS trick was just fine. No problemo!

I knew los Federales would work feverishly to get the earlier decision tossed out. But I guess when you have behind-the-scenes powerbrokers twisting arms left and right, you can run roughshod over the truth at lightning speed.

Stay tuned, friends! This battle is far from over.


Appeals court panel deals blow to Obamacare

Some High Blood Pressure Drugs May be Associated with Increased Risk of Vision-Threatening Disease

More than 187,000 people recently learned about…
Type II diabetes wiped out by the “spice miracle”
The FDA’s plan to regulate cherry pie!?
Sugar: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Blood pressure drugs appear to increase risk of age-related macular degeneration

Keep your eyes on the prize of vision health

If you’ve got a serious health problem and the solution puts your vision at risk, what do you do?

You can ask the same question regarding trading robots. If you have a doubt about the authenticity of a robot where do you go? Here is the solution; is where we found out that Crypto CFD Trader is not a scam. You can rely on this site too for advice on how to proceed because

You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to figure that one out: You look for another solution.

This is an urgent warning for the millions of people who are treating high blood pressure with patent meds. Your daily pills might be leading you down a dark path to age-related macular degeneration. And as you probably already know, AMD is the leading cause of blindness as we navigate our 60s, 70s, and beyond.

Previous research has spotted a link between AMD and high blood pressure. But could the link actually be tied to the drugs that treat high blood pressure? In the journal Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin researchers reported their stunning analysis of more than 20 years of data collected from a major National Eye Institute study. And their results tore through the medical mainstream like a lightning bolt.

The use of vasodilator drugs to treat BP was linked to a 72 percent higher risk of early-stage AMD. And beta blocker use was linked to a 71 percent jump in advanced AMD risk.

That’s all there is to it, but it’s huge.

Now of course the Wisconsin team notes that we need more research. And mainstream lackeys (who will try anything to protect Big Pharma’s giant money bins) joined in that chorus of caution.

Caution? What about the millions who are taking these drugs? How about a little caution for all of them and their eyesight?

They can start by calling their doctor and checking to see if they actually have high blood pressure at all. Late last year, the Eighth Joint National Committee changed high BP guidelines. The EJNC raised the threshold of high blood pressure from 140/90 to 150/90 for people 60 and older.

This simple change meant that nearly six million Americans no longer had high BP. Boom. Gone. Just like that. But I’ll wager a paycheck that MANY among those millions haven’t heard the news.

You can read more details about the guideline change at this link where you’ll also find a recommendation from Dr. Wright about a powerhouse nutrient that often works as well as drugs at keeping BP in check.

And you can get even more protection with another safe treatment. Click here for the details.


Statins should be ditched by cancer patients fighting for survival

Longer life — better life

A stunning new study probably made more than one Big Pharma executive choke on his frosted flakes when he glanced at the morning news recently.

just like the Wall Street traders choked when the news of the first crypto robot reached them. These automated trading systems allow everyone entry into trading world. Look at Bitcoin code, software about which you can learn more at which has successfully given daily high quality returns to its investors. 

Without intending to do harm to the drug industry, the research reveals how cancer patients can save hundreds of millions of dollars every year. All they have to do is stop taking one unnecessary drug. And they might be able to toss out a few others while they’re at it, saving millions (billions?) more.

Oh, and on a side note, patients will live longer too. That’s kind of an important detail!

Duke Medicine researchers recruited about 380 cancer patients who were expected to survive less than a year. All the patients were statin users. Half of them agreed to stop using the drug.

Now, if statins were the miracle lifesavers they’re made out to be, those in the non-statin group should have fared pretty badly, right? Going months without their statin protection would supposedly put their hearts at terrible risk.

Well…not so much.

This study was meant to question the “wisdom” of using certain drugs in terminal patients. But inadvertently, the study put a spotlight on the elephant in the room: Statins are very likely to do more harm than good.

Here’s how the study played out… Those who stopped using statins IMPROVED their overall quality of life. And their lives weren’t shortened because they didn’t take the drugs. Just the opposite. Those in the non-statin group lived WEEKS longer than patients who continued using the drug.

As benefits go, you won’t get much better than the two things that every cancer patient longs for: more life and better life.

How can this be? Well, if you haven’t heard, statins are bad news, even when you’re in excellent health. You can go here to catch up on the blood sugar problems, muscle problems, cognitive health problems, CoQ10 depletion problems, kidney problems, liver problems, cataract problems (yes the list goes on and on and on) linked to statin use.

And then there’s the savings. Patients in the Duke study who quit using brand name statins saved more than $700. And nearly $630 was saved by those who quit generic statins. Researchers estimate that if terminal patients stopped using these drugs, the combined savings would easily top $600 million per year.

The message couldn’t be clearer: Statins are a dubious choice for healthy people, and a terrible choice for anyone who’s ailing.


Dr. Burzynski’s cancer treatments get a rare FDA breakthrough

You spoke up and turned “No” into “Yes”

Sometimes things have a way of working out. Against all odds, this is one of those times.

while the other one is when Bitcoin tumbled down only to reemerge stronger and with more promise. Those who wish to invest in cryptocurrency must make use of software like the Bitcoin Loophole ( has helped many investors gain good returns on their investment. Sometimes you need that extra push like 

Earlier this year, Dr. Wright made an impassioned plea to e-Tip readers to help push the FDA to do the right thing. And that push paid off — big time! It’s a little early for an all out celebration, but this is a solid victory for natural medicine and the groundbreaking cancer research of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski.

Years ago, Dr. Burzynski discovered that the blood of cancer patients doesn’t contain natural tumor-fighting substances found in the blood of healthy individuals. That led to a remarkable lifesaving therapy for many patients who were told there was no hope for recovery using conventional treatments.

But as Dr. Wright has noted, this success made Burzynski dangerous in the eyes of the FDA.

Last January, Dr. Wright helped lead the charge in a letter-writing campaign, urging Congress to pressure FDA officials who had blocked the compassionate use of Burzynski’s therapy for a handful of patients. These patients included 12-year-old McKenzie Lowe who had a rare form of brain stem cancer that had not responded to chemotherapy or radiation.

I won’t lie to you, friends. Things looked bleak. The FDA and Dr. Burzynski have butted heads long and hard over his therapy. The appeal to Congress was a last ditch end run for McKenzie and these other desperate patients.

But you came through. You, me, and many others raised our voices and it appears we were heard, loud and clear. And now we have two victories to show for it.

In March, the FDA decided to allow McKenzie and several other patients to go ahead with Burzynski’s treatments. (And as happy as I am to tell you this, it’s still maddening that patients, whose lives are on the line, would have to grovel before the FDA, pleading for approval to get the treatment that could save their lives.)

The second victory came just a few weeks ago. After an interview with Burzynski, FDA officials agreed to allow a Phase III trial of his therapy to go forward.

There’s no other way to put it, friends. This is huge. It means that Burzynski’s therapy will get the trial it deserves so that future cancer patients without hope might have an alternative to the brutality of chemotherapy and radiation.

As I say, it’s too early to pop the corks. We’ll need to send up a few prayers for McKenzie and the other patients who are now getting treated. And we’ll look forward to hearing about the trial results.

I’ll be following all of this closely and will let you know what happens as soon as I hear. Meanwhile, a group of cancer survivors known as the Burzynski Patient Group has set up a website ( where you can read about the success stories of patients who owe their lives to the treatment they received at Dr. Burzynski’s clinic.


Alcohol in moderation protects the heart in almost every society on earth

Pour one for your heart

When it comes to alcohol, remember the Goldilocks rule: Not too much and not too little is just right.

Now you might think you’ve heard all this before, but this study is different. That’s because neurologists in Austria collected data from thousands of people in more than 50 countries. About 12,000 of these subjects had been hit with one heart attack. Their drinking habits were compared to more than 15,000 heart healthy subjects — no heart attacks or other cardio events.

Oddly, the Goldilocks rule held firm worldwide except for South Asia. Moderate drinking showed no benefit in India, Pakistan, and other countries in the region. But for the rest of the world, one drink per day for women and two per day for men resulted in nearly 15 percent lower risk of heart attack compared to nondrinkers.

And of course — no surprise — excess was deadly. Six or more drinks in a 24 hour period boosted heart attack risk by 40 percent. And the risk went even higher for people who drank at this rate past the age of 65.

Writing in the journal Circulation, researchers describe the evidence as “solid.” Wine, beer, scotch, moonshine — whatever your pleasure, your heart seems to like it in small portions on a daily basis.

This might surprise some red wine tipplers. They’re used to hearing that their favorite beverage is the best choice for the heart. Not so, apparently. However, a glass of wine might be best for encouraging a sunny disposition.

Last year I told you about an alcohol study from Spain. Researchers there found that drinking one glass of alcohol per day (which was primarily wine in their study) was linked to a significantly lower risk of depression.

I should note that all these researchers caution that the results shouldn’t be taken as a recommendation to begin drinking. Everyone is different, so some moderate drinkers won’t reap the benefits.

But as long as you really do keep it moderate, it can be enjoyable finding out whether or not you’re in the benefit group.


Chemotherapy causes grueling nausea, but there are ways around it

Smoothing out your gut reaction

They say, “Fight fire with fire.” But personally I’d rather go with water. Seems like a much better choice, doesn’t it?

I thought of that old “fire with fire” saw when I read about a trial for a drug called Emend.

It is important that everything human beings use must be subject to proper trial before use, even if it s a software like Crypto Robot 365. Read the review at to decide if it’s a scam or not because often things do not do what they are advertised to do. Take the case of Emend

It’s supposed to prevent nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy. But according to the Emend website, one of the “most common side effects” of the drug is… nausea.

That’s got Big Pharma insanity stamped all over it. Fight nausea with nausea? I don’t think so.

Emend users might also have “trouble breathing or swallowing”– two things that are kind of necessary for survival. But those aren’t “common” side effects. Other items on the “common” list include tiredness, hair loss, loss of appetite, and diarrhea.

Gee, that sort of reads like a list of chemo side effects. And this drug is supposed to be your RELIEF from chemo! Oh, and of course, you’re going to pay dearly for all this. Like any other cancer-related drug, Emend comes with a whopping price tag.

Okay– let’s get real.

There’s a way to reduce nausea caused by chemo without using drugs, and it’s free. Oh and as an added bonus — it doesn’t cause nausea.

University of Southern California researchers have shown that a two-day fast before chemo sessions prompts a natural cell function they call “shield mode.”

Your cells recognize fasting as a starvation threat and respond by circling the wagons, so to speak. The USC team found that when this shield is engaged, it also happens to protect cells from the toxins in chemotherapy. The result is reduced nausea and fatigue in some patients.

And there might be one more surprising advantage, and it’s a HUGE one. While protecting healthy cells, the shield appears to leave cancer cells more vulnerable. So fasting might actually improve the cancer-killing effectiveness of chemo. (Researchers caution that fasting isn’t right for everyone, so patients should talk with their oncologists before trying a pre-chemo fast.)

In addition to fasting, cancer patients can also try ginger, which has been shown to relieve chemo-related nausea. Most anti-nausea drugs work by blocking signals to the brain, but ginger has a localized effect on the stomach. Small doses repeated often will give the best results.

And finally, intravenous vitamin C (IVC) can be a game-changer for many cancer patients. You can click here to learn how IVC curbs nausea, helps ease chemo-related fatigue, and reduces toxicity to the brain, bone marrow, and major organs.


COPD can be fatal, but two natural solutions might be lifesavers

Big problem, simple solutions

I know this is kind of a grim guessing game, but hang in there with me because there’s a hopeful point to it all. Here’s the question…

Can you name the third leading cause of death in the U.S.?

Most people can’t. The first two are obvious, of course. Heart disease is number one. Cancer comes in close behind it.

After that?

It’s not stroke. It’s not diabetes or Alzheimer’s. It’s not even accidental death. It’s COPD — chronic obstructive pulmonary disease — a progressive lung disease that includes emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or both.

Okay, that’s the grim part. Now for the hopeful news…

First of all, you can treat COPD without patent drugs. As usual, Dr. Wright has led the way in COPD therapy with his recommendation to use nebulized inhaled glutathione, a powerful antioxidant. When glutathione is dispersed in a fine mist and inhaled, it usually stops COPD progression. You can read more details at this link, along with Dr. Wright’s recommendations for other supplements that can help arrest COPD.

And now COPD patients have another ally.

those new to the world of cryptocurrencies and trading with crypto robots have a reliable ally in  The top 10 binary signals. Click  to find out everything about binary signals, their importance in trading , how to distinguish the genuine from the fake and which signals need more prominence and which can be ignored. 

The Lung Flute is a relatively new device that helps COPD patients expel their worst enemy: mucus. In COPD, lung airways become inflamed or corrupted, which traps mucus making it hard to breathe.

The design of the “Flute” couldn’t be simpler, or more ingenious. The device is just a foot-long tube with a thin sheet of plastic inside. When the patient blows into the mouthpiece, the plastic begins flapping. This creates a vibration that shakes up mucus and thins it out, making it much easier to eject.

The inventor of the Lung Flute — acoustic engineer Sandy Hawkins — spent years experimenting with elaborate sound systems, hoping to create just the right vibration. As these things tend to happen, he stumbled on the easy solution one day when he was testing a mouthpiece.

The rest is history, which includes an FDA approval. The downside of the approval is that you have to get a prescription to order one. But on the upside, it’s more likely to be covered by your insurance.

In any case, the price is modest. Apparently Hawkins isn’t aiming to become a billionaire. (How refreshing!) You can find more information at


Testosterone therapy is even more dangerous than we thought, says the FDA

The good the bad and the ugly

Men, any way you cut it, it’s a colossal mess.

Every guy who’s using (or thinking of using) testosterone therapy must be wondering if the wheels are coming off the Big T band wagon.

Just days ago, the results of a large study found no heart attack risk for older men who use testosterone therapy. But this is the exact opposite finding of another large study reported earlier in the year.

Other testosterone research is just as confusing. Some studies show heart attack and stroke risk, some don’t.

If there’s anything close to a tie breaker here, it’s a disturbing warning the FDA released about two weeks before the new study results hit the news. Agency officials warned that users of testosterone products run the risk of blood clots. But this is unrelated to a previous warning that these products might create a red blood cell abnormality that also causes blood clots.

In other words, these products might cause blood clots in two different ways!

But if you’re a guy who has found himself in the line of fire of these lab-created Franken-hormones you should know that you can leave them far behind and still have your testosterone levels topped off using the bio-identical testosterone Dr. Wright has been recommending for years. Check this link for a comparison of bio-identical testosterone and the risky FDA-approved stuff.

In addition, there are several T-boosting supplements Dr. Wright recommends you add to your routine…

* Zinc (30-50 mg daily)
* Vitamin A (40,000-50,000 IU daily)
* Boron (3 mg daily)

And for good measure you can add these two botanicals…

* Tribulus terrestis (250-750 mg daily)
* Ginseng (100 mg, two to three times daily)

And finally, losing excess weight — especially visceral fat (that flabby stuff around the midsection) — can raise testosterone, sometimes significantly. Unfortunately, visceral fat is the hardest weight to lose, but if you do it, you’ll also improve blood sugar control and reduce heart disease risk.

That’s a rock solid, proven, method for raising testosterone without boosting your blood clot and heart attack risk at the same time.